Legal Opinion

Stephan v. Kentucky Valley Distilling Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 2, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

Prior to the effective date of the 18th amendment to the Federal Constitution, U. S. C. A. Const. Amend. 18, a corporation known as “Wright and Taylor’'’ owned a tract of land in Bullitt county, Kentucky, containing about forty acres, upon which it had constructed and operated a large distilling plant. Upon the tract, but some distance from the plant, were two springs from which water necessary for operating the distillery was obtained by means of pipe lines laid both under and upon the intervening surface. The springs had long before been cleaned…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hicks v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Prewitt v. WilbornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. WorleySupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  4. Stockwell v. CouillardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  5. Martin v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harned v. SmootCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. Demaree v. DemareeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Carr v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. Marr v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Rhoades v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API