Legal Opinion
MULLINS v. THE CONSOL ENERGY, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 16, 2022No. 2:20-cv-01883Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TIMOTHY MULLINS, ) ) ) Plaintiff ) ) 2:20-cv-1883-NR ) v. ) ) THE CONSOL ENERGY, INC. LONG ) TERM DISABILITY PLAN, ) ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION J. Nicholas Ranjan, United States District Judge In this ERISA benefits dispute, now before the Court are two competing summary-judgment motions.1 Mr. Mullins argues that he is entitled to reinstatement of his long-term disability benefits as a matter of law. Consol instead argues that its administrative ruling terminating the benefits should be upheld. After…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fleisher v. Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Doroshow v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Donald Orvosh, in 99-3589 v. The Program of Group Insurance for Salaried Employees of Volkswagen of America, Inc. The Volkswagen of America, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan Committee, Individually and as Plan Administrator of the Program of Group Insurance for Salaried Employees of Volkswagen of America, Inc. Volkswagen of America, Inc., in 99-3573Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Bergamatto v. Bd. of Trs. of the Nysa Ila Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Potts v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.