Legal Opinion

Matter of Cimino

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 1, 2000No. 99SA84PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, we must determine the appropriate level of discipline to impose on a lawyer who entered into a prohibited business transaction with a corporation, while simultaneously representing the corporation. A hearing panel of the former grievance committee 1 approved the findings and the rec ommendation of a hearing board that the respondent, John A. Cimino, be suspended for sixty days, be required to attend an eth-ies seminar, and pay the costs of the proceeding. Cimino excepted to the panel's and board's findings and recommendations. We accept the findings and most of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. RobnettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. In Re QuiatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. In Re CohenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. People v. FritzeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. People v. GinsbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re RiebesellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2008
  2. People v. CohenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. People v. BrahamSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. People v. CozierSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  5. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Angelique LAYTON, 36480Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API