Legal Opinion

In Re Quiat

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 26, 1999No. 97SA121, 97SA461PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in these two consolidated lawyer discipline cases, Andrew L. Quiat, was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1972. A hearing board heard No. 97SA121, the bankruptcy matter, on May 8, 9, and 20, and June 6, 7, 25, and 26,1996. At the conclusion of the hearing, the board found that Quiat had committed professional misconduct and recommended that he be suspended from the practice of law for six months. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings, but modified the recommendation to require Quiat to petition for reinstatement. Because we set…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re ChandlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. La Plata Medical Center Associates, Ltd. v. United Bank of DurangoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Elk River Associates v. HuskinColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Black v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of FargoColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re CardwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. In Re SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. In Re Attorney D.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Elrick v. MerrillColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In Re HickoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API