Legal Opinion

Farar v. Eli

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 26, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Hopkins Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Moorman

Affirming.

This is a companion case to that of J. D. Eli against C. J. Trent, &c., this day decided. The -suit was instituted in the Hopkins circuit court to recover a judgment of $790.00 against appellees, for the breach of covenants of warranty in deeds from J. D. Eli to W. II. Bay, and from the latter to appellant, who claims the right to rely on both warranties. The deeds conveyed the fee to a tract of about 40 acres of land, but neither of the grantors *31owned the minerals in the land. In the companion Case we decided that the grantee was not entitled to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ison v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Whitt v. WhittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Mattingly v. SpeakCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ford v. Ford'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Morris v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. French v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Grigsby v. DraughnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API