Mattingly v. Speak
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 62 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM NELSON CIRCUIT COURT.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HARDIN
delivered tub opinion of tiie court:
It. is true, as insisted for the appellants, that to authorize the chancellor to annul or modify the terms of a conveyance or other written instrument, on the ground of mistake as to its contents or legal effect when executed, such mistake must be clearly established, and must not be a mere inference from the weight of evidence. But we think it is satisfactorily showm by the testimony of McAtee, the draftsman, and Mrs. Richie, the female grant- or in the deed to Hagan, that the makers of the deed did not intend to so convey the title as in any…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Russell v. CurranWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
- Ison v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Ford v. Ford'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Tourtillotte v. TourtillotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Arnett v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.