Legal Opinion

Mattingly v. Speak

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 26, 1867PublishedCited by 11 opinions

CASE 62 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM NELSON CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE HARDIN

delivered tub opinion of tiie court:

It. is true, as insisted for the appellants, that to authorize the chancellor to annul or modify the terms of a conveyance or other written instrument, on the ground of mistake as to its contents or legal effect when executed, such mistake must be clearly established, and must not be a mere inference from the weight of evidence. But we think it is satisfactorily showm by the testimony of McAtee, the draftsman, and Mrs. Richie, the female grant- or in the deed to Hagan, that the makers of the deed did not intend to so convey the title as in any…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Russell v. CurranWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ison v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Ford v. Ford'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Tourtillotte v. TourtillotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Arnett v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API