Legal Opinion
Sheehan v. Morris Irrigation
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1987No. 15550PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBBERPUHL, Circuit Judge.
PROCEDURAL STATEMENT
Plaintiffs Harvey and Andrea Sheehan (Sheehan) appeal from an order dismissing defendant United Pacific Insurance Company (United Pacific).
FACTS
In 1979, Harvey Sheehan joined with Fred Schafer (Schafer) in a plan to irrigate *570approximately 12,000 acres of land in Sully and Hughes Counties, South Dakota. They contracted with defendants Morris Irrigation and Johnson Brothers Company to build this massive irrigation system (hereinafter the Irrigation Project Contract). Sheehan later purchased Schafer’s interest in this scheme.
The final payment on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Camelot Excavating Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Vesey v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Phenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn v. PerkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sheehan v. United Pacific Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Sheehan v. Morris Irrigation, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Avera St. Luke's Hospital v. KaramaliDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
- First Dakota National Bank v. BancInsure, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- County of Pennington Ex Rel. Northwest Pipe Fittings, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.