Legal Opinion
Sheehan v. United Pacific Insurance Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1989No. 16393PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, Harvey and Andrea Sheehan (Sheehan), appeal from a trial court order dismissing their cause of action against defendant united Pacific Insurance Company (United Pacific). We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
In Sheehan v. Morris Irr., 410 N.W.2d 569 (S.D.1987) (Sheehan I), we reversed and remanded the dismissal of Sheehan’s complaint against United Pacific. We held that the two-year limitation period in United Pacific’s bond was void and that Sheehan had commenced the action in a timely fashion.
After Sheehan I, the 1988 South Dakota Legislature enacted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Baatz v. Arrow BarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Baldwin v. First National Bank of the Black HillsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Appeal From the Final Decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division, for AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Van Emmerik v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Gasper v. FreidelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Sheehan v. Morris Irrigation, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re the Estate of FlawsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GalligoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.