Legal Opinion

Slessinger v. Buckingham

United States Circuit Court

Decided January 29, 1883PublishedCited by 17 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

Sawyer, J.,

(orally.) In this case Í am compelled to decide that the evidence is insufficient to show an infringement before the filing of this bill; or, indeed, an infringement at any time. The evidence is very slight upon those points. There are two points made by defendants, both of which, I think, are well taken. One is that if it is conceded that the articles charged to have been made are an infringement of the patent, it does not appear that those articles were sold or made prior to the filing of the bill. The defendants make that point and rely upon it. The only testimony is, taking it…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  2. Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Ready Auto Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
  3. Johnson v. MundySupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  4. Chicago Grain Door Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1905
  5. Humane Bit Co. v. BarnetU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API