Slessinger v. Buckingham
United States Circuit Court
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
Sawyer, J.,
(orally.) In this case Í am compelled to decide that the evidence is insufficient to show an infringement before the filing of this bill; or, indeed, an infringement at any time. The evidence is very slight upon those points. There are two points made by defendants, both of which, I think, are well taken. One is that if it is conceded that the articles charged to have been made are an infringement of the patent, it does not appear that those articles were sold or made prior to the filing of the bill. The defendants make that point and rely upon it. The only testimony is, taking it…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Ready Auto Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
- Johnson v. MundySupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Chicago Grain Door Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1905
- Humane Bit Co. v. BarnetU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.