J.P. v. Taft

ORDER AND OPINION

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Third Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 For the reasons set forth herein, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Third Motion for Summary Judgment.

II. STATEMENT OF FACTS

A. Background

Defendant, Ohio Department of Youth Services (“ODYS”) serves as that “legal custodian for [Ohio] juvenile offenders, age 10-21 who have been adjudicated delinquent as a result of committing felony violations.” PL’s Ex. A. ODYS operates by fund or contract institutions including but not limited to: Cireleville Juvenile…