Scott v. Cleveland Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From tbe Putnam Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
The appellant sued the appellee for
damages suffered by her on account of the alleged negligence of the defendant.
The circuit court sustained a several demurrer to both paragraphs of the complaint, for want of sufficient facts. The appellant refusing to amend or plead further, the appellee had judgment, upon demurrer, that plaintiff take nothing by her suit.
The error assigned is upon the ruling upon the demurrer.
The substance of the first paragraph of the complaint is as follows: That on June 20,1893, appellant resided at Bloomington, Indiana, on the Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Columbus, Chicago, & Indiana Central Railway Co. v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. CarperIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- White v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Sage v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Indianapolis & Northwestern Traction Co. v. HendersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Holliday v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- State ex rel. Millice v. PetersenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Eikenberry v. ThornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.