Legal Opinion

Dunitz v. Satovsky

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1928No. Docket No. 152, Calendar No. 33,700PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

The plaintiffs filed this bill to quiet title to certain real estate in the city of Detroit, Michigan, and to recover damages for loss of a sale of the premises. The property involved is located at 3350 Glendale avenue, Detroit. The plaintiffs owned the fee. On January 9, 1926, they deeded it to Harry B. Dizik, one of the defendants, to secure the payment of certain taxes on another piece of property for1 which Harry Dunitz, a brother of the plaintiff, was indebted. The deed was absolute in form but was accompanied by an agreement showing that it was intended as security only, and containing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. Old National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bourget v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Bullington v. LoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. SokolikSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Jungbert v. MarretCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  3. Rowen & Blair Electric Co. v. Flushing Operating Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cuvrell (In Re F & T Contractors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  5. Pioneer Sand & Gravel Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API