Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Albers v. Kuper

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1994No. 18166Published

1ConcurrenceWuest, Justice

In spite of the statutory authority of SDCL ch. 19-10, which statutes have allowed judicial notice in a wide range of circumstances, this court has held that, “There is no authority allowing a circuit court to take judicial notice of an ordinance. An ordinance therefore must be admitted into evidence prior to instructing the jury on its language.” Nose v. Christensen, 409 N.W.2d 131, 132 (S.D.1987).* However, the court in Nase *748also suggested that, “Perhaps for this reason our legislature has enacted a provision simplifying their admission.” Nose, 409 N.W.2d at 132 (citing SDCL 9-19-18). SDCL…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Walz v. City of HudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lovell v. Oahe Electric CooperativeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Elfring v. PatersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Stevens v. Wood Sawmill, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Byre v. City of ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API