Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Murray

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1884No. 11,037PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This was an action by the appellants, as. real estate brokers, against the appellee, to recover damages, upon an alleged contract for the sale of the appellee’s real estate.

The complaint was in three paragraphs. The first paragraph was for services in finding a purchaser and selling the. appellee’s land, and the second for services in finding a purchaser according to contract.

The 'third paragraph of the complaint stated that the appellee employed the appellants to find a buyer for his farm, agreeing that they might have as a compensation all that could be realized over and above $1,090; that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. McClave v. . PaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Tombs v. AlexanderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Richards v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  5. Lane v. AlbrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merkeley v. FiskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Lockwood v. HalseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Platt v. JohrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Barney v. Yazoo Delta Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Mullen v. BowerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API