Tomlinson v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado.
1Opinion of the Court
THAYER, Circuit Judge.
John Tomlinson, the plaintiff below and the plaintiff in error here, was in the employ of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Bailroad Company, the defendant in error, *253hereafter termed the "defendant,” as a bridge builder and a repairer of bridges on the line of its road. To ena,ble Mm to discharge his duties promptly, conveniently, and efficiently, two cars had been assigned to him for his use, which belonged to the railroad company, and in these cars the plaintiff was in the habit of traveling with his tools and materials from place to place where his services happened to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HamblySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Central Railroad Company v. KeeganSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. CharlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Martin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Louisville & N. R. Co. v. StuberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Chandler v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Southern Railway Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Farrar v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Mexican Cent. Ry. Co. v. SpragueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.