Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Stuber
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee.
1Opinion of the Court
LURTON, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error, William Stu-ber, sustained a severe injury through the negligence of an engineer in charge of a detached engine upon which he was riding. Both-the engineer and Htuber were at the time in the service of the railroad company. There was a judgment upon a verdict for defendant in error. 102 Fed. 421.
This case turns upon the single question as to whether the negligent. engineer and S tuber were fellow servants. The facts were undisputed, and were as follows: Stuber for many years had been the “foreman of water supply” upon an extensive division of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HamblySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- New England Railroad v. ConroySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Russell v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Winters v. Baltimore & O. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Kinnear Mfg. Co. v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- Dayton Coal & Iron Co. v. DoddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Illinois Cent. R. v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Ætna Life Ins. v. FriersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.