State v. Welch

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in denying his motion to suppress the identification testimony of two employees of the store allegedly robbed.

The court found as facts the following:

Defendant had been in the store on a prior occasion, and the witnesses had observed him for about fifteen minutes on the date of the robbery. Defendant stood about four feet away from them, and escorted them physically to a bathroom. The store was well lighted. Both witnesses viewed numerous pictures in the days following the robbery without identifying defendant. Both gave accurate descriptions…