State v. Thompson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
By his sole assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the in-court identification of defendant by State’s witness James Ray Wilder. He argues that the in-court identification was tainted by imper-missibly suggestive photographic and lineup procedures prior to trial, and was therefore admitted in violation of his constitutional due process rights. We have carefully reviewed defendant’s assignment and find it without merit.
It is settled law that identification evidence must be excluded as violating the due process…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. YanceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. ChatmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.