Thom v. Sensenbrenner
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
This action was commenced, in 1932, as an action at law to recover damages for deceit, by which plaintiff was induced to sell certain shares of corporate stock on March 22, 1924. Defendants demurred to the complaint on the ground that “the action was not commenced within the time limited by law, as provided by sec. 4222, Wis. Stats, of 1923.” The court sustained that demurrer and plaintiff appealed. It appears upon the face of the complaint that the fraud charged was committed on or prior to March 22, 1924. Plaintiff’s cause of action to recover damages for that deceit accrued on that date.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bartlet v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- City of Madison v. Southern Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Lotten v. O'BrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Board of Regents of Normal Schools v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Sander v. NewmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Feest v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Krestich v. StefanezWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- The MacCabees v. TerrySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Caveney v. CaveneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Augustine v. Congregation of the Holy RosaryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.