Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 27, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*852ANSWER OF THE JUSTICES

To the Honorable Senate of the State of Maine:

In compliance with the provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the Constitution of Maine, we, the undersigned Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, have the hon- or to submit the following answer to the question propounded on February 6, 1974.

QUESTION: Do the provisions of Legislative Document No. 2296, an Act now pending before the 106th Legislature (Exhibit A) unconstitutionally impinge upon an employer’s right to a trial by jury as declared by Article I, Section 20 of the Constitution of Maine?

ANSWER: We answer in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Ahmed's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Devine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Carol Brewster v. S.D. Warren/Sappi N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026
  3. Sirois v. WinslowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Sirois v. WinslowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API