Long v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 253 N.W. 762. Appeal from an order striking a complaint as sham and dismissing plaintiff's action. Only two questions are presented:(1) Is the foregoing order an appealable order? (2) Has the trial court power to strike a complaint as sham?
1. It is settled law that plaintiff cannot appeal from that part of the order dismissing her action, for an appeal will not lie from an order of dismissal but only from the judgment entered pursuant thereto. Thorp v. Lorenz, 34 Minn. 350,25 N.W. 712; Gottstein v. St. Jean, 79 Minn. 232, 82 N.W. 311. But the part of the order striking the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thorp v. LorenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Fettretch v. . McKayNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Lowe v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Gottstein v. St. JeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Vermilye v. VermilyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Johnson v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Clifton v. Darlington Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Meddick v. MeddickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938