Legal Opinion

Ross v. Cochran & Franklin Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1929No. 3541PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

Alfred Ross, colored, a minor 16 years, 8 months and 19 days old, was employed by the defendant company to do work in and about a stave mill, the employment being admittedly hazardous. On the tenth day after he was employed and while engaged in work at the mill, he received an accidental injury resulting in the loss of three-fifths of his left foot. The father and mother of the minor brought this suit for damages, for the use and benefit of the son, under Article 2315 of the Civil Code, alleging that the injury was due wholly to the fault and negligence of defendant; but in the alternative…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Philps v. Guy Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  2. Woodruff v. Producers' Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Whittington v. Louisiana Sawmill Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Union Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Liner v. Riverside Gravel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Benson v. Export Equipment CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bourgeois v. J. W. Crawford Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  5. Kennedy v. Johnson Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API