United States v. Dorian Dee Stuttley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
The five defendants in this appeal were members of a conspiracy that distributed cocaine and cocaine base in the Rochester, Minnesota, area. Ml five pleaded guilty in the district court. 1 They jointly and separately raise various issues on appeal. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
1. Alexander Faulkner’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
Faulkner argues that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to allow him to withdraw his guilty plea. See United States v. Capito, 992 F.2d 218, 219 (8th Cir.1993) (standard of review). Faulkner points to his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WarnerNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
- United States v. Dorian Dee Stuttley, United States of America v. Charles Antonio Webster, United States of America v. Alexander Faulkner, Also Known as Mike, United States of America v. Alexi Ricardo Bravo, Also Known as Carlos, United States of America v. Charles A. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Rogers v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
- United States v. Adrian MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Curtis TeeterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.