Legal Opinion
Green v. Artuz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 8, 1998No. 95 Civ. 2603(HB)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BAER, District Judge. 1
Petitioner Richard Green (“Green”), pro se, petitions this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus to challenge the lawfulness of his incarceration. Petitioner also moves for discovery pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. For the reasons set forth below, petitioner’s motion for discovery is denied, petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus is denied, and his petition is dismissed.
I. Background
This case arises out of a lengthy undercover “buy and bust” operation that occurred in March and April of 1989, in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Maurice Mayo v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Edwards v. Superintendent, Southport C.F.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Pizzuti v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Castillo v. WalshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Charles v. ArtuzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Hutchings v. HerbertDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.