Legal Opinion
United States v. Undetermined Quantities of Depressant or Stimulant Drugs
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided February 7, 1968No. 68-12-Civ-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE, QUASHING THE WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM, AND DIRECTING RETURN OF PROPERTY
ATKINS, District Judge.
This libel for condemnation is under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.1 The Complaint for Forfeiture alleges that the drugs seized are depressant or stimulant drugs within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 321 (v);2 that records were not prepared or kept with respect to these drugs as required by 360a(d) (1), that such failure is a prohibited act under § 331 (q) (4) and subjects the drugs to seizure and condemnation under § 334(a) (2) (A). Pursuant to a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Frank v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. James S. ReiffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Burden of Proof in Drug Offenses, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1975