Legal Opinion

Fritz v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1926No. 24,855PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.

Appellant was charged by affidavit, tried and convicted before a jury in the Howard Circuit Court of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor. Acts 1921 p. 736, §8356d Burns’ Supp. 1921. From a judgment assessing a fine and imprisonment, he prosecuted an appeal to this court assigning as error the overruling of his motion for a new, trial. He relies on two causes only to support his motion: (1) Misconduct of the prosecuting attorney in his closing argument to the jury, wherein he asserts that the prosecuting attorney was permitted, over his objection, to read to the jury and comment upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tribbey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Welch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. McNaught v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Barksdale v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Carlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. People v. JassoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Schieber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Maxwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API