Schieber v. State

The appellant was convicted of second degree arson and from this conviction he appeals.

This case was orally argued before this Court and the attorney for the appellant expressly stated that he was relying upon his fifteenth specification of error in his motion for a new trial—that the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial on account of misconduct of the prosecuting attorney—as the only meritorious question presented.

The question now presented is whether or not the appellant has presented any question for this Court to review. The 15th reason for a new trial is as follows:

“Because of…