Legal Opinion

People v. Jasso

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 2012No. H037099PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MÁRQUEZ, J.

A jury convicted defendant Alexander Javier Jasso of attempted murder and other crimes arising from his shooting at people through a window at a McDonald’s restaurant in Prunedale. On appeal he claims that the prosecutor committed misconduct during the trial, that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear certain evidence and denying his motion to let the jury visit the crimes’ location, that there was insufficient evidence to punish him for his gang promotional activities, and that the trial was unfair when viewed as a whole.

We disagree and will affirm the judgment.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. (HC) Kemokai v. RackleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. (HC) Vasquez v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. In re I.G. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. People v. Castillo CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API