Legal Opinion

Wade v. Sumner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1911No. 1399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Courts Noble County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by R. E. Wade against Roy Sumner and A. C. Nice-wander to recover $550 damages for conversion of a piano. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

R. E. Wade, on July 29, 1908, filed suit in the district court of Noble county, and sought thereby to recover of and from Roy Sumner and A. C. Nice-wander the sum of $550, on account of the alleged wrongful conversion of one “Briggs” piano. Defendant Sumner answered by general denial, and further alleged that the said Wade was estopped by his own conduct and knowledge of circumstances from claiming ownership in said piano; that said Wade was not the owner, and that if he had purchased the same he did so with full notice of defendant’s rights, and that he purchased same,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. FellnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Brown Bridgeman v. Western Casket Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Farmer's State Bank v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fish v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Meservy v. StonerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Brown v. St. John Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API