Legal Opinion
Croll-Reynolds Co., Inc. v. Perini-Leavell-Jones-Vinell
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1969No. 24346_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge:
The appellants are the owners of patents for methods and apparatus for the cooling of concrete ingredients and mixes. The appellees are contractors or subcontractors engaged in the construction of a portion of the Amistad Dam across the Rio Grande River for the United States. The construction contract required that concrete, when deposited in the forms, should have a temperature of not more than 50 and not less than 40 degrees Fahrenheit.1 This required that concrete be cooled prior to pouring into the forms. The contract does not require that the cooling be done by any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bereslavsky v. Esso Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Stelma, Incorporated v. Bridge Electronics Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Consolidated Vacuum Corp. v. MacHine Dynamics, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1964
3Cited by12 opinions
- Toxgon Corporation v. Bnfl, Inc., and Gts Duratek (Now Known as Duratek, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Carrier Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Robishaw Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Molinaro v. Watkins-Johnson CEI DivisionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
- Alco Standard Corp. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.