Riedinger v. Marquette & Western Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Marquette. (Grant, J.)' Bill filed to perpetually enjoin defendants from constructing a railroad over-or across certain streets opposite complainant’s land, and to declare void certain privileges granted ¡by the city of Marquette to the defendant first named, etc. Complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Shekwood, J..
The Cleveland Iron Mining Company was ■organized in April, 1853, under the act of February 5, 1853, for the purpose of iron mining in the county of Marquette, in the State of Michigan, and became the owner of an iron mine near Ishpeming, in sa.id county, and also the owner of ■a. parcel of. land on the shore of Lake Superior, which the company platted into lots and streets, in September, 1854, .and caused the plat to be duly filed, and said parcel now forms a part of the city of Marquette. In making the plat, and dedicating the same, the company made a reservation referring to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Hall v. City of IoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Kneeland v. Van ValkenburghWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Union Lumbering Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Chippewa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crosby v. City of GreenvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Nichols v. Ann Arbor & Ypsilanti Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Commissioners of Parks & Boulevards v. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Douglass v. Belknap Springs Land Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
- Felton v. WedthoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.