Nichols v. Ann Arbor & Ypsilanti Street Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Washtenaw. (Peck, J., presiding.) Bill to enjoin the construction and operation of a street railway. Complainants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The bill in this case is filed to restrain and enjoin the defendant from placing ties and laying rails, and operating its railway, over and along the complainants5 land, situate in the' public highway, and from *362running cars and trains of cars propelled by steam, or any other motive power, upon said highway, along and in front of complainants’ premises.
The bill sets forth, substantially,—
That two of the complainants reside in the township of i&nn Arbor, Washtenaw county, and that the complainant Lucy L. Granger resides in Bay City; that they are the children and only heirs at law of Erasmus D.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The People v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- City of Clinton v. Cedar Rapids & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Hobart v. Milwaukee City RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Simoneau v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Mordhurst v. Ft. Wayne & Southwestern Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Rische v. Texas Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Zehren v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Howe v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.