Legal Opinion

Board of Com'rs of Seminole County v. Barker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1926No. 16744PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

The sole question presented for determination by this proceeding is whether the petition of plaintiff stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the board of county commissioners. It is clearly evident in this case that unless a liability existed against ■Seminole county, by reason of the injury sustained by plaintiff’s wife through defective construction of the bridge in question by Seminole county, there is no authority in law to support the contention that the board- of county commissioners was authorized and empowered to enter into the contract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James v. Trustees of Wellston TownshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Howard v. Rose Twp., Payne Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Welker v. Annett Bd. of Com'rs Pawnee Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hazlett v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. Atoka CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Board of Education of Town of Ringling v. State Ex Rel. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Champlin Petroleum Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Terry v. EdginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API