Legal Opinion

State v. Danaher

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 20, 2002No. 01-469Published

1Opinion of the Court

819 A.2d 691 (2002)

STATE of Vermont

v.

Martin M. DANAHER.

No. 01-469.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

November 20, 2002.

Present: AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.

ENTRY ORDER

¶ 1 Defendant Martin M. Danaher appeals the trial court's finding that he violated the "no contact" condition of his probation. On appeal, defendant argues that the court erred in concluding that he violated the "no contact" probation condition by being in physical proximity to the victim and that he was not provided fair notice that such actions constituted "contact." We affirm.

¶ 2 On October 11, 2000,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. MacE v. AmestoyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991
  4. State v. MosesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. State v. DanaherSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API