Legal Opinion

State v. Gingras

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 2, 2011No. 2010-274PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.

The defendant, Timothy Gingras, was convicted of reckless conduct, RSA 631:3 (2007), criminal threatening, RSA 631:4, 1(a) (2007), and criminal mischief, RSA 634:2 (2007), following a jury trial in Superior Court {McHugh, J.). On appeal, he challenges only the criminal threatening and reckless conduct convictions, arguing that the trial court erred: (1) in sentencing him on both convictions; (2) in failing to give his proposed self-defense jury instruction; and (3) in instructing the jury that brandishing a firearm constituted the use of deadly force. We reverse these two convictions and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. State v. FordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. State v. BruneauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. State v. KousounadisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. State v. McMinnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NoucasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  2. State v. BakunczykSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  3. State of New Hampshire v. Jamie LockeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  4. State v. Kyree RiceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  5. State v. LeavittSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API