Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Cordell v. Pallet Cos., Inc. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2016No. 2015-0163Published

1DissentO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 41} Respectfully, I dissent.

*493{¶ 42} In my view, James Cordell voluntarily abandoned his employment with Pallet Companies, Inc., when he used an illegal controlled substance in violation of a drug free workplace policy, and therefore, he is not entitled to temporary total disability compensation for unrelated workplace injuries he sustained after he violated the drug free policy.

{¶ 43} Temporary total disability (“TTD”) compensation “is intended to compensate an injured worker who is temporarily unable to return to the duties of his or her former position of employment as a result of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API