Legal Opinion

Innes v. Dalsheim

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 4, 1988No. 87 C 2064PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NICKERSON, District Judge.

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Pursuant to a plea agreement to a total concurrent sentence of 4V2 to 9 years, petitioner pled guilty on December 19, 1983 before the Supreme Court, Queens County, to four counts of robbery in the second degree. The court accepted the plea agreement and conditioned petitioner’s remaining at liberty pending sentence on, among other things, petitioner’s not getting “rearrested and charged with any other crimes or offenses.” The court told petitioner that if he violated any of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. OutleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Innes v. DalsheimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. Spence v. SuperintendentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  4. Janick v. Superintendent, Franklin Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
  5. Innes v. DalsheimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API