Legal Opinion

Bussell v. Putnam Furniture Outlets

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 27, 2003No. 01-P-1034PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff’s complaint, generally concerning an allegedly defective mattress and foundation purchased for $442, was dismissed without prejudice on April 12, 2001, for failure to satisfy the Superior Court’s $25,000 jurisdictional minimum. See St. 1996, c. 358, § 5.2 The plaintiff then had the option of appealing the dismissal to a single justice of the Appeals Court, within seven days, pursuant to § 6 of c. 358, or simply recommencing the action in the court with appropriate jurisdiction (the District Court) as permitted by § 7 of c. 358. Instead, the plaintiff filed a motion for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. ROPT Ltd. Partnership v. KatinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Ben v. SchultzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  3. Graves v. HutchinsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Velardi v. GivensMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
  2. Carnelli v. Bell at Salem StationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  3. Foley Realty Group, Inc. v. Estate of AntoneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API