Legal Opinion

Croup v. Humboldt Quartz & Placer Mining Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1915No. 12704PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered April 1, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action upon a promissory note, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is an action to recover $3,000, principal, and the stipulated interest upon a promissory note given by respondents to appellant. The defense was that the note was given as the second installment of the purchase price for the sale of a group of mining claims by appellant to respondents; that the sale contract made time of its essence, and provided for a forfeiture in the event of a failure to pay any installment of the purchase price when due; that, on the nonpayment of this note when it fell due, appellant did declare forfeiture, and thereby relieve respondents from all liability on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Douglas v. HanburyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Walker v. McMurchieWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Norman v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Finch v. SpragueWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Geranios v. Annex Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Jones-Short Motor Co. v. BolinWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Bramwell Inv. Co. v. Uggla Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API