Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Farrier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 29, 1884PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Loehren, J"., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

Under ordinary circumstances an assertion by an owner of property,'offered for sale, as to its value, although false, does not charge the vendor with legal responsibility, for the reason that it will rarely occur that a party to a contract of sale has been induced without culpable negligence on his own part to enter into it in reliance upon the expressed opinion of the adverse party as to the value of the property. Misrepresentations, in order to constitute actionable fraud, must be as to material ^facts of a nature to affect the conduct, of others; and, generally, a mere statement of an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simar v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Kost v. BenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Chrysler v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Hathaway v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Busterud v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Yost v. MillhouseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Security Mutual Casualty Company v. Affiliated Fm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. Mountain v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API