Legal Opinion

Anna Bord v. Amy L. Hillman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 2015No. A15A1512PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray, Judge.

Anna Bord and Victor M. Bondar (“Bord and Bondar”) appeal from the trial court’s order granting Amy L. Hillman and Daniel A. Hillman’s (“Hillmans”) motion for partial summary judgment as to counterclaims related to harm allegedly caused by a retaining wall separating Bord and Bondar’s property from the Hillmans’s property. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

When ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the opposing party should be given the benefit of all reasonable doubt, and the court should construe the evidence and all inferences and conclusions therefrom most favorably to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Ginn v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. BelcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  4. Hammond v. City of Warner RobinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Alexander v. Hulsey Environmental Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Amy L. Hillman v. Anna BordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. STROUD Et Al. v. HALL COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. Jeanette Bartenfeld v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  4. Georgia Department of Transportation v. Cathy MixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  5. J.K. v. Main Street Lodging, Inc., doing business as Sundown SuitesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API