Legal Opinion

United States v. Barbanell

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, District Judge.

Defendant Morris Barbanell moves for the suppression and return of certain items taken after a search on October 28, 1963, at his place of business at 108 East 16 Street in New York City. The search and seizure took place after defendant was arrested for wilfully and knowingly importing into the United States a shipment of merchandise by means of a false invoice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 542. No indictment or information has been filed as yet in this case.

The arrest grew out of an investigation of defendant Barbanell conducted by Customs Agent Robert Frager.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eduardo Amador-Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. SohnenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1969
  3. United States v. Bagnall, Allan J., in No. 89-5801, and Bagnall, Beverly Jayne, in No. 89-5802Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. CamingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  5. Adair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API