Legal Opinion
United States v. Caming
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 15, 1991No. 90 Cr. 0556 (SWK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
On August 27, 1990, defendant Stanley Caming was charged in a two-count indictment with structuring financial transactions in violation of Title 31 U.S.C. § 5324. Defendant now moves to suppress evidence seized from his automobile at the time of his arrest as well as a post-arrest statement made prior to advice of his Miranda rights. Defendant also moves for production of hand written notes of post-arrest statements.
BACKGROUND
In February 1989, the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) commenced a year-long investigation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Stanley CamingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Ellis v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. ScopoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993