Legal Opinion

In Re Allied Chemical Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2007No. 04-1023PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

in which Justice HECHT, Justice MEDINA, Justice GREEN, and Justice WILLETT joined.

Trial judges have broad discretion in scheduling discovery and trial, but that discretion has never been unlimited. As we stated in 1847, trial courts may set trials as they wish, but not so indiscriminately that the parties are “deprived of any just defense, or that their rights would in any manner be jeopardized.” 1

Since 1847, new kinds of litigation have emerged that require new applications of this rule. Eleven years ago in Able Supply Co. v. Moye, we held that in mass tort cases involving hundreds of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Colonial Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. General Motors Corp. v. GayleTexas Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. In Re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Faust v. BNSF Railway Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  3. in Re: Ten Hagen Excavating, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  4. In Re Helena Chemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. Dewhurst v. Hendee, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API