Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1921No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Genesee; Brennan (Fred W.), J. Bill by William H. Smith against Sarah Smith to enjoin summary proceedings and for an accounting. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

The testimony in this record in many particulars is irreconcilable. We shall not attempt to detail it but will content ourselves with a statement of the facts we are satisfied its preponderance establishes. Plaintiff at the time of the hearing of the case in the court below was 72 years old. At the age of 21 he married the defendant, then 16 years old. Neither was possessed of any property at the time of the marriage. He was an ignorant laboring man and was unable to read, write or figure. For a. number of years they lived at Imlay City in Lapeer county. Four children were born to them there,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fisher v. FobesMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Adlard v. AdlardIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Judd v. JuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Connolly v. KeatingMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Waterman v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Grossman v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  3. Lake Shore Coach Lines, Inc. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Frank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  5. Nurrie v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API