Kilpatrick v. City of Anacortes
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
The Anacortes Board of Adjustment voted at a public meeting to deny the Kilpatricks’ application for a variance. Twenty-seven days later, the Kilpatricks sought review in superior court. The statutory time limit for seeking a writ is 10 days from the Board’s "action.” The court dismissed their complaint as untimely. We affirm, rejecting the argument that "action” requires entry of a written document. The "action” that triggered the appeal period was the Board’s vote.
MOOTNESS
F. Michael and Sally Kilpatrick sought a variance to build two houses on a 10,500-square-foot parcel where the minimum…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- North Street Ass'n v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Concerned Organized Women & People Opposed to Offensive Proposals, Inc. v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Northshore Investors, LLC v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- King's Way Foursquare Church v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Northshore Investors, Llc, Apps./cross-res. v. City Of Tacoma, Res./cross-apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013