Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bank of California, N. A. v. National City Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1926No. 19609. En BancPublished

1DissentFullerton, J.

(dissenting) — It may be, that when I concurred in the opinion in the case of Manker v. American Savings Bank & T. Co., 131 Wash. 430, 230 Pac. 406, I did not fully grasp its purport and effect, but, I certainly did not understand that it overruled the cases relating to the negotiability of municipal warrants theretofore decided by the court. I thought we were laying down the rule that a different situation was presented where the instrument was a municipal bond, negotiable in form, than is presented in the instance where the instrument was an ordinary municipal warrant. This much I was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. American Freehold-Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. GelbachWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bardsley v. SternbergWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Manker v. American Savings Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Fidelity Trust Co. v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API