Picone v. Shire U.S. Inc. (Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Class Action)
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * * * * * In re INTUNIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION Civil Action Nos. 1:16-cv-12653-ADB * (Both Direct and Indirect Cases) 1:16-cv-12396-ADB * * * * * REVISED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BURROUGHS, D.J. This “pay-for-delay” or “reverse settlement” case arises from an alleged anticompetitive agreement made between the brand and generic manufacturers of Intuniv, a medication used to treat Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (“ADHD”). Defendants Shire LLC and Shire U.S., Inc. (collectively, “Shire”) manufacture…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.