Legal Opinion

In Re. Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Commodity Futures Trading Commission WD Energy Services Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 3, 2006No. 05-5168PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal of a discovery order. In April 2003, E. & J. Gallo Winery sued WD Energy Services, Inc. (f/k/a EnCana Energy Services, Inc.) in the Eastern District of California during the pendency of an investigation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission of the California natural gas market. Gallo alleged that WD Energy (and other energy companies) had unlawfully manipulated the California energy market in violation of state and federal laws. During discovery, Gallo sought documents from WD Energy with respect…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas 04-124-03 & 04-124-05Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America, Inc. v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. United States of America v. Iss Marine Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Lardner v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API