Legal Opinion

Bahn v. Estate of Fritz

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1932No. 6,924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiffs, as copartners, brought this action to establish a claim against the estate of Henry Fritz, deceased, based upon an account. The transaction giving rise to the claim occurred in the state of Illinois, in 1922, where all parties then resided and where plaintiffs still reside. The complaint contains two causes of action and is in the usual form for an action for goods sold, and it sets forth that Henry Fritz, the purchaser of the merchandise, died in the county of Missoula, this state, in January 1930; that Edmund T. Fritz was appointed administrator of the estate; that the claim was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clawson v. Boston Acme Mines Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Farthing v. SamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Kirsch v. LubinNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Shaw v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Perry v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. HartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  2. Girson v. Girson, Admx.Montana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Matteson v. AckersonMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Wippert v. Burlington Northern Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API